Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | jean-emmanuel depraz | 9-5 | None |
Mono Black Demons | tatsuaki yajima | 9-3 | None |
Golgari Midrange | tchuco | 7-2 | None |
Dimir Bounce | robert borkowski | 8-6 | None |
Mono Black Demons | yosuke shimizu | 8-4 | None |
Rakdos Midrange | ryohei takezawa | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Control | oruç aslan | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Skeletons , Esper Pixie , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Gruul Leyline , Mono Black Demons
Chainer's Edict ranks #1426 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 28%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Chainer's Edict is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Performance Efficiency: 10.27 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Chainer's Edict has a win rate of 59.7%, making it 25.7% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chittering Rats | Creature — Rat | 5 | 75.0% | 1 |
Disfigure | Instant | 7 | 64.6% | 2 |
Pestilence | Enchantment | 7 | 59.4% | 1 |
Night's Whisper | Sorcery | 5 | 55.0% | 1 |
Guardian of the Guildpact | Creature — Spirit | 6 | 54.6% | 1 |
Defile | Instant | 5 | 54.5% | 0 |
Relic of Progenitus | Artifact | 11 | 52.8% | 1 |
Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 5 | 51.8% | 0 |
Fanatical Offering | Instant | 5 | 51.8% | 0 |
Thorn of the Black Rose | Creature — Human Assassin | 23 | 51.5% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Chainer's Edict than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deglamer | Instant | 2 | 5 | 72.7% | 58.1% | +14.6% |
Spinning Darkness | Instant | 6 | 8 | 70.6% | 60.0% | +10.6% |
Defile | Instant | 1 | 5 | 73.2% | 63.7% | +9.4% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 18 | 67.2% | 57.8% | +9.4% |
Chittering Rats | Creature — Rat | 3 | 5 | 73.5% | 64.9% | +8.5% |
Disfigure | Instant | 1 | 6 | 67.3% | 59.4% | +7.8% |
Nihil Spellbomb | Artifact | 1 | 10 | 65.4% | 58.6% | +6.8% |
Crypt Rats | Creature — Rat | 3 | 12 | 67.1% | 61.3% | +5.9% |
Pestilence | Enchantment | 4 | 5 | 66.7% | 61.5% | +5.2% |
Blood Fountain | Artifact | 1 | 9 | 62.8% | 58.0% | +4.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | 10 | 4.0% | 46.5% |
Dimir Midrange | 9 | 0.4% | 38.7% |
Golgari Midrange | 7 | 0.8% | 45.9% |
Mono Black Demons | 6 | 3.1% | 84.0% |
Esper Pixie | 4 | 0.2% | 40.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.